Not signed in (Sign In)

Vanilla 1.1.2 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

  1.  

    I always though Al-Khwarizmi was Arabian as that is what I was tought in school. In the March 25 2006 "By the numbers" It says he is Persian:wink:

    •  
      CommentAuthorcmseagle
    • CommentTimeMar 10th 2007
     

    you actually fence, or is that screenname just a bunch of BS? And what exactly are you talking about in this post?

    •  
      CommentAuthorTaed
    • CommentTimeMar 10th 2007
     

    They're referring to this item:
    * The Persian mathematician al-Kwarizmi considered 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29, and 31 to be unlucky, due to their nature as prime numbers. However, 6, 28, 496, and 8128 were lucky, as they are "perfect numbers" (numbers whose divisors add up to the number: 1•2•3=6, and 1+2+3=6).

    •  
      CommentAuthorUdoboy
    • CommentTimeMar 11th 2007
     

    al-Khwarizmi was definitely born in the Persian Empire, near 800 AD.

    •  
      CommentAuthorFact totum
    • CommentTimeMar 13th 2007
     

    As if we need more evidence: Archaeologists have uncovered his passport and it was issued by Persia

    •  
      CommentAuthorTaed
    • CommentTimeMar 13th 2007
     

    However, it didn't have the holographic markings, so it's assumed to be a fake.

    • CommentAuthor5010
    • CommentTimeMar 13th 2007
     

    I have doubts about the passport. Back then, weren't over 80% of Arabians in Persia undocumented emmigrants?

    •  
      CommentAuthorCody56
    • CommentTimeMar 13th 2007
     

    Isn't this discussion supposed to be on unlucky numbers? :neutral:

    •  
      CommentAuthorFact totum
    • CommentTimeMar 13th 2007
     
    Posted By: 5010

    I have doubts about the passport. Back then, weren't over 80% of Arabians in Persia undocumented emmigrants?

    Let's not exaggerate. It was 78.9%. Which still leaves 21.1% that were properly documented.

  2.  
    Posted By: Taed

    They're referring to this item:
    * The Persian mathematician al-Kwarizmi considered 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29, and 31 to be unlucky, due to their nature as prime numbers. However, 6, 28, 496, and 8128 were lucky, as they are "perfect numbers" (numbers whose divisors add up to the number: 1•2•3=6, and 1+2+3=6).

    Since al-Kwarizmi considered all of those #'s unlucky, what made 13 stick out the most?

    •  
      CommentAuthorTrance
    • CommentTimeApr 16th 2007
     

    Maybe because it's in the middle?

  3.  

    I like your logic Trance. Only if all things were this simple. :wink:

    •  
      CommentAuthorTrance
    • CommentTimeApr 16th 2007 edited
     

    They are.

    Edit: Except Geography, that stuff is hard.

  4.  

    Geometry,though,is easy.