Vanilla 1.1.2 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
-
-
CommentAuthorCody56
- CommentTimeMar 15th 2007
Posted By: Trance
Posted By: Cody56
Posted By: Trance
If you made a time machine that was stationary, that instead of travelling through time, just sped it up, you could overcome that transport issue.
If you traveled that fast you would be going faster that the speed of light, if you weren't dead already, you could never die because you're going so fast that anything that touches you will disintegrate including bullets, knives, etc. So you would eventually die of starvation.
Is there a reason you can't slow down or something?
I don't know why but my friend is a genius at these things (he told me about this). Professor Carty (not really)
He also took some parts from a microwave and made a microwave gun. Of course he put a metal wall between him and the waves, or else...
Then he took 11 microwaves to make a cannon and liquefied a tree in 30 seconds!
Of course then the power company called because he had used 2 days worth of energy in 30 seconds
-
-
-
CommentAuthorTrance
- CommentTimeMar 15th 2007
How is that possible, it can't have been plugged in if it could hit a tree, and it can't have used electricity if it wasn't plugged in.
-
-
-
CommentAuthorCody56
- CommentTimeMar 15th 2007
Extension Cord! Duh!
-
-
-
CommentAuthorFact totum
- CommentTimeMar 15th 2007
A tiny nuclear reactor. Like the one Timex uses for it's watches
-
-
-
CommentAuthorCody56
- CommentTimeMar 15th 2007
Posted By: Fact totum
A tiny nuclear reactor. Like the one Timex uses for it's watches
With a tiny meltdown that burns your flesh and gives you cancer.
Technically it would be Timex L.L.C. -
-
-
CommentAuthorcmseagle
- CommentTimeMar 15th 2007
Posted By: Cody56
Posted By: Fact totum
A tiny nuclear reactor. Like the one Timex uses for it's watches
With a tiny meltdown that burns your flesh and gives you cancer.
Technically it would be Timex L.L.C.Technically, if you had a reactor on your wrist you wouldn't live long enough to get cancer.
-
-
-
CommentAuthorCody56
- CommentTimeMar 15th 2007
Well the mutated cells might grow at a rapid rate giving you cancer for your short lifespan
-
-
-
CommentAuthorFact totum
- CommentTimeMar 16th 2007
Posted By: cmseagle
Technically, if you had a reactor on your wrist you wouldn't live long enough to get cancer.
No -- they've solved this problem. They've come up with a new kind of alloy that is lightweight and yet can shield one from the radiation of a reactor the size of a mustard seed.
-
-
-
CommentAuthorHaoest
- CommentTimeMar 16th 2007
Would you risk it?
-
-
-
CommentAuthorFact totum
- CommentTimeMar 16th 2007
Sure! It would be worth it not to have to wind it for tens of thousands of years and have an accuracy of being off no more than .1 seconds per 1000 years.
-
-
-
CommentAuthorHaoest
- CommentTimeMar 16th 2007
Ever heard of the term "Time is nothing, timing is everything?"
-
-
-
CommentAuthorFact totum
- CommentTimeMar 16th 2007
Not in a long while
-
-
-
CommentAuthorCody56
- CommentTimeMar 16th 2007
Posted By: Cody56
Posted By: Fact totum
A tiny nuclear reactor. Like the one Timex uses for it's watches
With a tiny meltdown that burns your flesh and gives you cancer.
Technically it would be Timex L.L.C.That's why I'm old-fashioned with kinetic watches.
-
-
-
CommentAuthorD League
- CommentTimeMar 17th 2007
That's why I'm old-fashioned with sun dials.
-
-
-
CommentAuthorcmseagle
- CommentTimeMar 17th 2007
I just look at the sun.
-
-
-
CommentAuthorTaed
- CommentTimeMar 17th 2007
I just ask someone else.
-
-
- CommentAuthorestebanissexy
- CommentTimeMar 17th 2007
I just dont have a job
or make any appointments
or have any friends
-
-
CommentAuthorD League
- CommentTimeMar 17th 2007
That explains a lot.
-
-
- CommentAuthorestebanissexy
- CommentTimeMar 17th 2007
good one!
-
-
CommentAuthorD League
- CommentTimeMar 17th 2007
I can just feel the sarcasim.
-
-
- CommentAuthorestebanissexy
- CommentTimeMar 18th 2007
nono! there was no sarcasim at all!
sarcasm, on the other hand... there was plenty of that
-
-
CommentAuthorD League
- CommentTimeMar 18th 2007
oops. I apologize for my spelling.
-
-
-
CommentAuthorTrance
- CommentTimeMar 18th 2007
Him you apologise to?!
-
-
-
CommentAuthorD League
- CommentTimeMar 18th 2007
No, it was a general apology. Except to you.
-
-
- CommentAuthorestebanissexy
- CommentTimeMar 18th 2007
Posted By: Trance
Him you apologise to?!
am I not apologize worthy?
-
-
CommentAuthorTrance
- CommentTimeMar 18th 2007
It's nothing against you, It's just he never apologises to me for spelling, he just comes out with that D League dictionary bull!
-
-
-
CommentAuthorcmseagle
- CommentTimeMar 18th 2007
Posted By: Trance
apologises
Maybe it's like one bad speller apologizing to another? Looks like spell check insurance just went up again.
-
-
-
CommentAuthorTrance
- CommentTimeMar 18th 2007
Touché.
I can make this right again though by apologizing for my bad spelling.
Sorry.
-
-
-
CommentAuthorcmseagle
- CommentTimeMar 18th 2007
You are forgiven. (By me at least)
-
-
-
CommentAuthorD League
- CommentTimeMar 18th 2007
It was spelled right in the revised D League 18th edition.
-
-
-
CommentAuthorcritdragon
- CommentTimeMar 19th 2007 edited
d league is always wrong so that means it was
-
-
-
CommentAuthorUdoboy
- CommentTimeMar 19th 2007
No, I'm pretty sure D League and Wrong are two different people.
-
-
-
CommentAuthornyarfdude
- CommentTimeMar 19th 2007
This thread is for discussion of time travel, isn't it?...
-
-
-
CommentAuthorcritdragon
- CommentTimeMar 19th 2007
if there was a black hole, it would take in everything, even light, so would this include changing the amount of time for things to reach us and make us go through time??
meh that makes little sense to me aswell
-
-
-
CommentAuthorjsimpleton
- CommentTimeMar 19th 2007
relativity breaks down in infinite gravity. so yea i don't really knows how physics work in a black hole, whether quantum physics or general relativity theory is applied. maybe time just stops in a black hole
-
-
-
CommentAuthorYika
- CommentTimeMar 19th 2007
Blame the aliens
-
-
-
CommentAuthornyarfdude
- CommentTimeMar 19th 2007
Who are you?!
-
-
- CommentAuthorestebanissexy
- CommentTimeMar 19th 2007
an alien of course! he's trying to desensitize people to the idea of aliens living among us. all part of their diabolical plot to take over our planet so they can harvest some more souls to sell to satan for sport cars and women
evil, evil aliens
-
-
CommentAuthorAthene
- CommentTimeMar 19th 2007
Posted By: nyarfdude
Who are you?!
Obviously it's Nimro Klims. He heard about the site (probably from Udoboy) and decided to subvert us all. Be afraid, be very afraid.
-
-
- CommentAuthorestebanissexy
- CommentTimeMar 19th 2007
so Nimro Klims is a satanic alien
who woulda thunk it
-
-
CommentAuthorzymurgy
- CommentTimeMar 20th 2007
it is posisble to travel forward in time currently by the slowing of one's measured time in conjunction with gravity to another's constant in time; however into a past or dimension, this may prove imposisble; difficult to say the least
-
-
-
CommentAuthornyarfdude
- CommentTimeMar 20th 2007
Indubitably.
-
-
-
CommentAuthorzymurgy
- CommentTimeMar 20th 2007
it's not so much the question of whether one may travel to and fro in time, rather, it's what actions or inactions would one perform, i.e., observer or participant
-
-
-
CommentAuthorFact totum
- CommentTimeMar 20th 2007
How do you figure?
-
-
-
CommentAuthorzymurgy
- CommentTimeMar 20th 2007
I don't....purpose and definition are ultimately responsible for such a question not the journey..hope that's not too "tree-huggerish"
-
-
-
CommentAuthorFact totum
- CommentTimeMar 20th 2007
interesting. So you discount the debate of whether the premise is valid and want to discuss the details.
Sort of like, Forget that I'll be stretched to death as I approach a black hole. Once I land on the surface of it, will I be able to pick a dime up off the sidewalk?
-
-
-
CommentAuthorzymurgy
- CommentTimeMar 20th 2007
let's hope for dimes; it'd be a shame if it were pennies. Conversely, I like stretching; although I'm not sure how safe it is in the dark.
I don't disagree that the details; the hypotheticals, are in fact important when considering something such as this. However, perhaps it is because of this very oversight that we have as of yet been able to build and travel back in time with a machine.
-
-
-
CommentAuthorUdoboy
- CommentTimeMar 20th 2007
Posted By: Fact totum
interesting. So you discount the debate of whether the premise is valid and want to discuss the details.
Sort of like, Forget that I'll be stretched to death as I approach a black hole. Once I land on the surface of it, will I be able to pick a dime up off the sidewalk?
I suspect something on the surface of a black hole (not the event horizon, but the surface itself) would have nearly infinite weight.
-
-
- CommentAuthor5010
- CommentTimeMar 20th 2007
Yes, and the cosmic forces of such weight cause nearly infinite flatness, meaning the surface quickly becomes nearly infinitely smooth as well as nearly infinitely reflective, but the reflected energy cannot escape the event horizon so any energy just bounces between the surface and the horizon, producing nearly infinite heat and brightness.
It's like 9-11 times infinity.
-
-
CommentAuthoreasyEmu
- CommentTimeMar 20th 2007 edited
Could someone please travel back in time and insert a poll into this thread?
Thanks!
-