Vanilla 1.1.2 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
• Privately-owned nuclear weapons are legal in 47 states, though they must be registered with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the State Department.
I would very much like to know how many privately owned nuclear weapons are registered with the nuclear regulatory comission, and which states do not allow you to privately own nuclear weapons.
I have a nuclear weapon in my back yard, don't you?, all the cool kids do. 
We made a Freedom of Information Act request for that information a few months ago, because, frankly, we were wondering the same thing. However, our request was denied, but it wasn't clear if it was denied for security reasons or because the information didn't actually exist. We've since filed another, more clearly-worded request, and we'll post the results when they arrive.
As for the states where they're not allowed, that would be Alaska, Delaware, and South Dakota. They're also prohibited in the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico.
One of my neighbors is trying to split atoms in his backyard with an axe. Needless to say, he hasn't gotten very far.
I don't even trust most of my neighbors with shoveling the sidewalk, let alone weapons of mass destruction.
Guam has no law against private ownership of nuclear weapons, by the way.
Guam is an interesting case. While Guam has no specific law against it, they did sign the Micronesian Atomic Protocols in 1969 (along with the Federated States of Micronesia, the Marshall Islands, et al, with the lone exception of the Republic of Kiribati) which essentially declared the Micronesian islands a nuclear-free zone from both weapons and power-generation. However, Guam is also a protectorate of the U.S. and thus cannot sign such treaties without the approval of the Senate (which was never even voted on), so it has no legal standing as far as the U.S. is concerned. Nixon made it clear that while the U.S. had no current plans to deploy nuclear weapons in Guam, it reserved the right to do so in the future. It's generally believed that the U.S. has never placed nuclear weapons there due to fear of antagonizing China. There are, however, plans in the works to build a small reactor for desalinization purposes, though since the M.A.P. has no "teeth", it's unclear if the other Micronesian islands will formally protest if plans proceed into actions.
if i could, i would send you guys a picture of me sitting on my nuclear warhead...
Surprisingly, most of us *do* own nuclear weapons.
The department of Nuclear Physics at the University of South Dakota demonstrated (1979? I'll have to double-check the date) that an average household smoke alarm contains enough radioactive material to level 2 city blocks, if properly combined with a few items available at any drug store.
Oddly enough, today's smoke alarms contain 3 to 5 times more radioactive material than those produced in the late '70s, and the average household has more than one of them.
Yes they have radiation, but not the correct kind. The radiation particles inside your smoke alarm are Alpha radiation particles, which means they cannot escape the fire alarm's plastic shell, and can't possible be dangerous to humans since the radiation can't penetrate your skin.
Your smoke alarm would only be hazardous if you swallowed it whole, whilst it was turned on.
That's where the "if properly combined" part comes in. We're not talking about raw active radiation. We're talking about nuclear reactions *using* radioactive materials.
You're right about the radiation not escaping the alarm's plastic shell (to some extent). But along that same line, uranium, plutonium, and a myriad of other radioactive materials can't release radiation that escapes their confines either (by confines I mean the mass of earth and stone they're buried in) - otherwise, we'd all be poisoned. BUT, all of those things can be mined and used to manufacture nuclear weapons using the beauty of nuclear fission. You only need the radioactive material - be it from a smoke alarm or a mass of uranium ore - for the process.
Here's another explanation: Take any nuclear bomb - remove the "weapons grade" plutonium core (the fuel), and replace it with a household smoke alarm. You still have a bomb, albeit a much weaker one since the fuel grade and quantity are significantly lower.
Ah I see your point, Yes you could make nuclear weapons, but weak weapons.
Yes. Weak, but strong enough to destroy 2 city blocks (as mentioned earlier)
From one fire alarm? I think maybe if you spent millions of pounds (or dollars) splitting the atoms, And had an extremely lucky day, it may be possible. I think the scientist forgot to mention that it would take the absolute biggest explosion possible by the alarm to destroy two city blocks.
It's not like if you drop your fire alarm, it'll explode. 
Posted By: TranceFrom one fire alarm? I think maybe if you spent millions of pounds (or dollars) splitting the atoms, And had an extremely lucky day, it may be possible. I think the scientist forgot to mention that it would take the absolute biggest explosion possible by the alarm to destroy two city blocks.
It's not like if you drop your fire alarm, it'll explode.
Of course it wouldn't explode. you need all the other parts of the nuclear bomb to make it explode. The smoke alarm will explode under the proper circumstances, and just dropping it will do nothing, except mabey make it malfunction.
You'd need to split the atoms first, I was just kidding..
Posted By: TranceFrom one fire alarm? I think maybe if you spent millions of pounds (or dollars) splitting the atoms, And had an extremely lucky day, it may be possible.
It's not like if you drop your fire alarm, it'll explode.
That's why I mentioned the whole build-a-nuclear-bomb,-replace-only-the-core-with-a-smoke-alarm" part. I don't think luck would have a lot of impact on the energy output, though.
I think it might. I mean if there's only a six percent chance of it exploding, you'd need luck.
Nah - you'd just need 1667 attempts to guarantee a 100% chance of success. No luck involved at all.
What modern scientist is going to spend millions of dollars on splitting fire alarm particles 1667 times?
Arguebly more importantly, why?
Posted By: TranceWhat modern scientist is going to spend millions of dollars on splitting fire alarm particles 1667 times?
A very unlucky one?
Touché.
You got my point!
i still don't think you can level 2 blocks using one fire alarm because it will take a very big bomb to do that anyway
Actually, no you wouldnt. A hydrogen bomb the size of your fist would take out, on average, 300 sq yards of just about anything (unless its something like diamond, but diamonds weird).
Actually, I could make you a Hydrogen/Dirty bomb. As long as you can get me some enriched Plutonium. (And, optionally (I could get it myself), some sulphur, so I can make gunpowder, so I can make dynamite).
Oh yeah - my first three-paragraph post!
lol yes, but i doubt you can get all of those out of a smoke detector
There was an interesting book that I read about 2 years back called The Radioactive Boy Scout which was the true story of a teenager who got a bit obsessed with nuclear energy and decided to build a breeder reactor in his backyard... and succeeded. He would go around to dumps until he gathered hundreds of smoke detectors (apparently old ones had a lot more of a radioactive element (iiridium?) than current smoke detectors), and also ordered some stuff in the guise of a college professor getting stuff for a chemistry lab.
As I recall, he didn't get into any real trouble with anyone except the EPA (although police and FBI were involved, they didn't really take any action), who ended up digging up the whole backyard's soil and carting it off as radioactive waste.
I read part of that one a while ago.
Posted By: TadGhostalyou'd just need 1667 attempts to guarantee a 100% chance of success. No luck involved at all.
When talking about chances, there's no guarantee. If you fail 1666 times, one is not assured of success on the next attempt.
Posted By: TaedHe would go around to dumps until he gathered hundreds of smoke detectors (apparently old ones had a lot more of a radioactive element (iiridium?) than current smoke detectors), and also ordered some stuff in the guise of a college professor getting stuff for a chemistry lab.
Iridium is okay, but doesn't have the energy potential that Uranium does.
They are if they're lucky.
1 to 30 of 30