Vanilla 1.1.2 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
Willeyum ov Ockum must hav been a terribul spellur.
Posted By: UdoboyIn the creation of the universe, you have a supernatural event
So the universe is unnatural. Got it.
Posted By: Fact totumPosted By: UdoboyIn the creation of the universe, you have a supernatural event
So the universe is unnatural
so's your face!
wow -- that was good.
So... How's everybody? It's been a while. I realize we're in the religious thread, but I also would like to have discussions here, so I figured this would be a good place to start. It feels weird being back; Who remembers me? Lol
So to start off, I have a point to make. I'm going to pick on Christianity here:
First, a few points.
1. You Christians say that God is completely good.
2. Christians say God created everything.
3. Christians say God is all-powerful and all-knowing.
Now for the question:
If God is all-knowing and the very essence of 'good', why did he create Lucifer, when he clearly knew that Lucifer would corrupt man and send so many souls to hell? By creating Lucifer, God KNOWINGLY created evil. And therefore we are left with a few possibilities...
1. God is all knowing/all-powerful but not good.
2. God is good but not all knowing and/or not all-powerful
3. He doesn't exist.
Tyler Durden: Listen to me! You have to consider the possibility that God does not like you. He never wanted you. In all probability, he hates you. This is not the worst thing that can happen.
Narrator: It isn't?
Tyler Durden: We don't need him!
Or, consider the possibility that he is so powerful and all-knowing, that it is beyond your comprehension to understand his motives.
Welcome back Nyarf, it's been pretty lonely. I like the Nicholas Cage!
Actually, the God of the Bible (Old Testament) is not particularly "good" at all. He's selfish and petulant at best; downright cruel and vindictive at worst.
Sounds like me.
Thanks for the welcome, Cody. As for Udo, I completely agree. I mean, for Christ's sake (yes, irony intended), in 2 Kings god actually sent 2 bears to maul 40 children for the sole offense of making fun of a bald guy's head. Seems a little harsh to me... But then again it's all made up anyway.
Oh, and Cody; If he was perfectly good and all-knowing as Christians say he is, he wouldn't have created Lucifer in the first place. One of them, or both must be wrong.
Of course, even if he did exist, he's not someone I would worship. (Not the God of the Bible, anyway. )
"...Possibly the most unpleasant character in all of fiction." - Richard Dawkins
Actually, there's strong evidence that Jehovah did not "create" Lucifer, but instead Lucifer is actually a different god, and Jehovah was merely attempting to stage a coup amongst the gods and take all the glory unto Himself. Yahweh elohim means "the lord of the gods" and not "the lord god" as is commonly mistranslated.
Most atheists seem to believe that Christians are ignorant because of scientific reason, but in my opinion, I see the exact opposite.
Think about Earth. It weighs about 7 septillion tons, and filled with valuable ores and rare elements. Now, when I think of this, what is also brought to my attention is that, there are billions upon trillions of other planets just like Earth and good chunk of those planets are at least good 2x to 3x as large as Earth.
And now you're telling me that a freak occurrence brought all of this matter into being by chance? An all powerful being sounds more believable than that.
Also, the chances of Jesus fulfilling all of the Old Testament prophecies (which were prophesied by multiple people over a good couple of eras) is the same as covering the state of Texas with silver dollars, painting one of them red, blindfolding yourself and finding it.
It's not a freak occurrence. There's an order to all of it.
They ain't called Jesus freaks for nothing. 
Posted By: Cody56And now you're telling me that a freak occurrence brought all of this matter into being by chance? An all powerful being sounds more believable than that.
I don't see why this is easier to believe.
Posted By: nyarfdudeIt's not a freak occurrence. There's an order to all of it.
Ok, then tell me how all of this matter came into existence.
Well, it all started in 15,641,354,224 B.C. when, in an alternate universe, a kzurmaton accidentally struck a jwarfth, ripping open the space-time continuum, and everything from several (smaller) universes flowed into this one.
Hahahaha Exactly
Posted By: Cody56Posted By: nyarfdudeIt's not a freak occurrence. There's an order to all of it.
Ok, then tell me how all of this matter came into existence.
I don't know that "God did it" is any more credible an answer than "we don't really know."
Ok, there is a difference between knowing and believing.
There is nothing in all of the universe that we can be completely sure about. Sure, there are the obvious things we can assume, like, a pig should have two ears, or Pink Floyd is the name of a band. But when it comes down to things like religion and such matters we can never be 100% certain what is the real answer until that day comes.
However, I put my faith and trust in that there is a God and that he loves me no matter what I do.
Who knows, maybe there is no God and for eternity it will be like Kurt Vonnegut's Slaughter House Five. But I put my faith in God.
Think about it this way, if there is a God, do you really want to spend an eternity in Hell?
Trance is spot on. And I have to admit; I'm not a full atheist. I'm an agnostic atheist. I do admit that nothing of this nature can be proven completely false or true. However, neither can the existence of flying invisible unicorns. It doesn't mean that I believe in them.
As for this argument:
Posted By: Cody56Think about it this way, if there is a God, do you really want to spend an eternity in Hell?
There are several things wrong with this argument (also known as Pascal's Wager), but I shall address only two:
1) One cannot simply will oneself to believe something that is evidently false to them.
2) More importantly, according to the Christian belief, blind unquestioning faith is needed in order to get into heaven. Trying to "trick" god in order to get to heaven would be useless if he truly does exist, for it wouldn't be real belief.
------
And one other thing for you to think about, Cody: Jesus condemns all those who do not accept him as the son of god and worship him. According to this, anyone who doesn't believe Jesus is God is going to go to hell. Now there's something inherently wrong here: Do you really think that an all-powerful omni-benevolent would impose ETERNAL DAMNATION on an otherwise innocent being whose only fault is being raised in a different culture with a different belief set? There are over 6 billion people in the world, and 2/3 of them have to suffer eternal death simply because they've been raised to believe something different. Does that seem logical to you, Cody? If you'd been born in the typical Indian household, you would be in the same situation. Think about it.
And I apologize if I appear condescending. That is not my intention.
Now, are you when you say this, are you talking about people who haven't heard about Jesus, or people who have just scoffed at the idea?
I actually was a little confused about people who didn't hear about Jesus being sent to Hell, so I asked my neighbor (he's a second father to me) and I don't really remember his idea, but I'll ask him about it and tell you what he says.
What I do remember includes something about the Resurrection. But tomorrow is Youth so I'll ask him about it.
Another thing to think about is all the good the Church has done (and don't get me started on Catholic corruption). It raises money to help people in poverty, it gives after-school activities to inner-city children to keep them away from drugs and gangs, religion as a whole makes you a better person (also not trying to condescend, sorry) because more often than not, a person's moral code is lax compared to the Church.
Edit: It's alright Nyarf, it'll be a challenge for me! Also, don't take what you see on Family Guy as what religion really is. That is a bunch of b*** s***. Also the name is Graham, not Cody. Cody is my dog's name.
Okay, well as for the good the church does, I don't deny that many church-going people are good people, and that the church has done good things. But so are people in any other religion and atheists. And religion, i'm sorry, has done much more evil in the world than atheism has. In case you hadn't noticed, a good 90 percent of all wars in earth's history were waged in the name of some religion or deity. How many wars were waged in the name of atheism? None. A big fat zero. But besides all that, just because someone is a good person it doesn't mean that they are right about everything. It just means that they're a good person, and that's not something I'm disputing. But not all religious people are good people. Christians make up about 75 percent of the overall population in the United States, but still manage to make up about 80 percent of the US prison population. Atheists make up about 13 percent of the United States population, but only make up about 0.2 percent of the total prison population. And that's not even discussing the rest of the religions.
As for Family Guy, I very rarely ever watch it. So I'm not getting any of my information from something like that, and if I did watch it regularly, I wouldn't use that as a credible source of information. I was however raised in a strict Catholic family and heavily believed in God until a few years ago. I read the Christian bible four and a half times (cover to cover) before my intellectual breakthrough to reality. So I am well-versed in the ways of Christianity. I've also since then studied other religions in order to become better acquainted with other views of the world. Just a little background info for you. I look forward to continuing this discussion with you, Graham. As you may or may not remember, my name is Robert. You can call me whatever you want. 
Oh, and as for people going to hell for not believing in Jesus Christ, most people will at some point be introduced to the idea of Christianity. But just like you've been raised in Christianity, they've been raised in other religions and believe them just as fervently. If a Hindu came up to you and tried to convert you, chances are you wouldn't listen because you're firm in your belief. But flip that situation around, and you understand that they've been raised in this religion through no fault of their own, and now most likely will continue to practice that religion for their entire life, despite being exposed to many other religions just as you are. You're aware of Hindus and Buddhists and Muslims and all these other religions, but you've been raised a certain way and so will probably not convert to any of these. Same goes for them and Christianity.
Posted By: Cody56Another thing to think about is all the good the Church has done (and don't get me started on Catholic corruption).
If the people running the religion show no fear of reprisal from God for abusing their authority, doesn't that make you wonder if they truly believe in God? If they don't, you should strongly consider that following their path is not correct. Not that Christianity is not the "right" religion, just that this branch is not right.
Religion doesn't cause wars, people cause wars. Have you ever seen a Bible with a gun?
If there were no religions, there would still be as many wars; people would just find another 'justification.'
Haha Trance, you're right about one thing; Religions themselves are not the problem. It's what people do with it that is dangerous. The wars over things other than religion are so much lesser in number than the religious ones. True, there would still be war, but I disagree with you here. There would be much less war. But my point here is not to show how good or bad religious people are. People are people, religious or not. Some good, some bad. I say religion can be a moral anchor for people who without fear of eternal damnation would probably make this world much worse. But people who are actually moral (atheist, Christian, or otherwise) do not need consequences to keep them from doing bad. The point; If you need the threat of everlasting suffering to keep you from committing evil deeds, then you are not a moral person.
Edit: Trance, you may be partially right about the number of wars staying the same with a different justification. But nothing motivates masses of people more than religion. Any other justification would not be as powerfully affecting to all those people.
Posted By: nyarfdudeEdit: Trance, you may be partially right about the number of wars staying the same with a different justification. But nothing motivates masses of people more than religion. Any other justification would not be as powerfully affecting to all those people.
I don't know about that one - take a look at all the things we humans have done to other humans just because they're different from us. If it wasn't because they were a different religion, it would be because they had different color eyes, or because they didn't cut their hair, or some other thing that would single them out. For example, Hitler didn't just focus on the Jewish people, he also went after people with disabilities and those who were gay - anyone who didn't fit his idea of the Aryan nation.
Well, yes. I'm not saying there aren't other powerful motivations out there, but Hitler got that far because of his charisma, and because he was a natural leader, he was able to gain many people to his cause. But I still say, and I could very well be wrong, that the number one motivator is religion over anything else. But that's not the main point I'm trying to get across here. I only brought that topic up because of Graham's claim of religion's moral superiority.
The number one motivator is stupidity. Usually, one guy is self-egotistic and powerful enough (back in the Dark Ages it was the pope) to use his power for self-gain. Then, usually a bunch of stupid people listen to him (not a her because women aren't that stupid) and do what he says. The number of idiots who listen to him is proportional to how likable and charismatic he is [or how powerful he is (the pope)]. This is how Hitler came to power, how the Crusades occurred (the pope used religion as a sort of catalyst for conquering Jerusalem), and pretty much every major war in history.
I'd go deeper, but I'm swamped from school and in desperate need of a nap.
*Yawn*
I tend to disagree with everybody here. Humans rose to the top of the ladder because of our willingness to step on anything and everything in our way. That's not a pleasant way to think about ourselves, but it's true. And we'll use whatever tools to do it, even if it means stirring up others using some religious ideology. Even if it's absurd or bogus.
I absolutely agree, Udo.
But one of my big questions for the Christians here remains unanswered: Why would an all-powerful omni-benevolent being impose eternal damnation on an otherwise innocent being whose only fault is being raised in a different culture with a different belief set?
Just 'cause he's all-powerful and omni-benevolent, doesn't mean he doesn't have a sense of humour.
Lol
Playing Devil's Advocate, the usual Christian response to your question is that God wants everyone to exercise their free will.
Posted By: nyarfdudeBut one of my big questions for the Christians here remains unanswered: Why would an all-powerful omni-benevolent being impose eternal damnation on an otherwise innocent being whose only fault is being raised in a different culture with a different belief set?
Depends who you ask. As a Catholic, I was taught and believe that so long as that person is following and developing their conscience to the best of their ability, there is the possibility of salvation.
What other denominations of Christians would say, I am not sure.
Posted By: UdoboyHumans rose to the top of the ladder because of our willingness to step on anything and everything in our way.
So a bigger brain, being bipedal and having opposable thumbs were not factors? Or secondary to ruthlessness?
Posted By: nyarfdudeBut one of my big questions for the Christians here remains unanswered: Why would an all-powerful omni-benevolent being impose eternal damnation on an otherwise innocent being whose only fault is being raised in a different culture with a different belief set?
(I may have already related this somewhere in these discussion baords) I saw a snippet about this that was really funny. A guy was asking a Catholic Cleric about salvation. The cleric's contention was that one had to accept Jesus as one's Savior in order to be saved. The interviewer asked, "Well, what about the Aborigines in New Guinea (or something) who had never heard of Jesus. Knew nothing about Christ or Christianity or the Bible or anything like that? God has doomed them because He plopped them down in the middle of the jungle and they never got word that they needed to acccept Jesus? The Cleric said, "Well -- no. They get a pass." So the interviewer asked, Why would a benevolent church EVER tell ANYONE about Jesus? People are obviously better off never having the opportunity to not accept Jesus. (I am paraphrasing all this). The cleric had no good response to that.
Posted By: cmseagleDepends who you ask. As a Catholic, I was taught and believe that so long as that person is following and developing their conscience to the best of their ability, there is the possibility of salvation.
What other denominations of Christians would say, I am not sure.
While I know (from experience, partly) that that is taught in Catholicism, that is not the official doctrine of the Roman Catholic Church. They don't make it that easy.
Also, that goes against exactly what Jesus supposedly said. He literally stated, in no uncertain terms, that anyone who did not believe him to be God was going to go to hell. Some Christian denominations came up with this ridiculous "pass" concept simply because the immorality of what Jesus supposedly said was blatantly obvious when presented with the question I gave above. But nowhere in the bible does it say anything about a "pass" to heaven. People made that up. (But then again, they DID make up everything else, too.)
Posted By: Fact totumPosted By: UdoboyHumans rose to the top of the ladder because of our willingness to step on anything and everything in our way.
So a bigger brain, being bipedal and having opposable thumbs were not factors? Or secondary to ruthlessness?
Those features allowed us to emply our ruthlessness in regards to all species, some which might be considered physically superior, and not just those weaker.
What about the Tyrannasaurus Rex?? Were they not more ruthless than any member of humankind?? (With the possible exception of The Spanish Inquisiton) Yet we slaughtered them in to extinction due to our more-developed brains.
I thought marmosets destroyed the T Rex.
No, T-Rex was a one-hit-wonder band ("Bang a Gong") from the mid-70s or so. The later Power Station (attempted 80s super-group) cover of the song is a poor cover in that it is almost indistiguishable from the original.
Well, this is somewhat relevant... Eric Clapton is god.
Frodo lives!
Ok, this is creepy. I'm reading Lord of the Rings and everywhere I go, there is some LOTR reference.
Example: I took a Facebook quiz concerning which super-villain I was, and the test said Sauron.
I was watching "Yo Momma," and one of the contestants was compared to Frodo. 
Oh, I just finished the Council of Elrond. Is Tom Bombadil the son of a king or something?